A New Capitalisn’t Episode: The Risk Of Reopening – a Reading List

Also Read

Who Is to Blame for the 2008 Financial Crisis?

The IGM Center at the University of Chicago has asked its American and European economist panel to rate the main causes of the financial...

Congress Is Leaning Towards a Big Tech Breakup

The dominant platforms have proven themselves to be ungovernable. Behavioral remedies, especially those that require continuous oversight, might be pushed aside. The...

Meet the Sugar Barons Who Used Both Sides of American Politics to Get Billions in Subsidies

Meet the Florida-based Fanjul brothers, who inject money to both political parties and dominate an industry that enjoys billions of dollar's worth of subsidies and protections.  Last week,...

Tech Monopolies Are the Reason the US Now Has a TikTok Problem

Tech platforms like Facebook say we should protect, empower, and celebrate their concentrated power for the sake of America’s national security. But...

Despite warnings from government and health officials, some states are choosing to begin reopening their economies this week by ending lockdown restrictions. In this episode, Luigi and Kate lay out the economic reasons why that could end badly.


Despite warnings from government and health officials, some states are choosing to begin reopening their economies this week by ending lockdown restrictions. In this episode, Luigi Zingales (University of Chicago) and Kate Waldock (Georgetown University) lay out the economic reasons why that could end badly.

Check the official map of confirmed Covid-19 cases in Georgia: 

Luigi and Kate discuss the results of the recent wave of the Booth-Kellog Financial Trust Index, a survey on how Americans react to social distancing and shelter in place orders. Click on the figure to read all ProMarket articles on the Financial Trust Index:

Luigi and Kate also mention a recent Beker-Friedman Institute study on the effects of news coverage of the coronavirus pandemic by the two most widely-viewed cable news shows in the United States–Hannity and Tucker Carlson Tonight, both on Fox News–on viewers’ behavior and downstream health outcomes. 

Sean Hannity. Photo by Gage Skidmore, via Wikipedia [CC BY-SA 3.0]

In their working paper, Leonardo Bursztyn, Aakaash Rao, Christopher Roth, David Yanagizawa-Drott find that 

“greater exposure to Hannity relative to Tucker Carlson Tonight is associated with a greater number of county-level cases and deaths. Furthermore, the results suggest that in mid-March, after Hannity’s shift in tone, the diverging trajectories on COVID-19 cases begin to revert.”

Read the full working paper here.

Last but not least, if you are interested in the debate on who should take sensitive decisions—elected politicians or technocrats—you might find interesting a recent working paper by Luigi Zingales on the political limits of economics: 

Latest article

Should the European Union Require Tech Firms to Adopt a Common Charger?

According to a new European Commission directive expected to be approved in the next few months, tech firms will have to use...

Chart of the Week: Economists Don’t Think Congress Should Make Price Gouging Illegal

Most economists disagree with a new bill in the US that would set limits on "unconscionably excessive prices," according to a recent...

Neoliberal Economists Are Giving Biden Bad Advice on Inflation

To spare the economy from the pain of further interest rate hikes, the President should aggressively pursue anticompetitive conduct by companies in...

How Would the Big Tech Self-Preferencing Bill Affect Users? 

The Senate looks to be nearing a vote on the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, which would prohibit gatekeeping digital platforms...

New eBook Revisits George Stigler’s Theory of Regulatory Capture 50 Years Later

To mark the 50-year anniversary of George Stigler’s seminal piece, “The Theory of Economic Regulation” we are publishing a new eBook examining...