Chris Sagers

Chris Sagers, the Charles R. Emrick Jr.- Calfee Halter & Griswold Prof. of Law at Cleveland State University, is a nationally recognized expert on American competition policy. He has testified before the U.S. Congress and the Antitrust Modernization Commission and is author of United States v. Apple: Competition in America (Harvard Univ. Press, 2019), Sullivan, Grimes & Sagers, The Law of Antitrust (West Publishing, 2015), Antitrust Examples & Explanations (Wolters Kluwer/Aspen, 2014) and, with Theresa Gabaldon of George Washington University, Business Organizations (Wolters Kluwer/Aspen Casebook Series, 2016; 3d ed. 2023). His articles have appeared in the Georgetown Law Journal, UCLA Law Review, and other leading journals. His press appearances include the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, L.A. Times, The Times of London, Slate, Agence-France Presse, CNBC, Fox News, and National Public Radio. He has served as member of the American Law Institute, the American Antitrust Institute, the Thurman Arnold Project of Yale Law School, and he has held leadership roles in the AALS and ABA Antitrust Sections. He has won several awards for teaching and scholarship, including CSU's campus-wide Distinguished Research Award, the law alumni association's Walter G. Stapleton Award for Faculty Excellence, and the student body's Teacher of the Year award. From 2014-2017 he served as founding Faculty Director of the Cleveland-Marshall Solo Practice Incubator. He has taught courses in Antitrust, Business Organizations, Securities Regulation, Legislation and the Regulatory State, Law & Economics, Administrative Law, Torts, Banking Regulation, and a seminar concerning the theory of the firm. Before joining the faculty, Professor Sagers practiced law for four years in Washington, D.C., first at Arnold & Porter and then at Shea & Gardner. He earned degrees in law and public policy at the University of Michigan and was an editor of the Michigan Law Review.

“Conservative” Antitrust: Something Possibly Kind of New Under the Sun, Maybe

Chris Sagers suggests that something significant could be happening in antitrust, though it probably remains academic for now, and it is hidden behind political messaging that in recent times has gotten most of the attention. He argues that the populist or politicizing talk of antitrust leaders during both the present administration and the last one has grown more detached from real-world administration. But he argues that there may be real change going on behind the scenes, as expressed in positions among some conservatives and Republican office-holders. He argues that the libertarian orthodoxy of the Chicago School no longer defines “conservative” antitrust, and that the range of plausible disagreement may genuinely be changing.

The News About Antitrust’s Impending Resurgence Has Been Greatly Exaggerated

The federal antitrust agencies don’t appear to be serious about their recent Big Tech push. And given that the Supreme Court and federal judiciary...

Paging Don Qixote: The Last Hope for American Merger Law

Of the eight or nine hundred antitrust claims each year, few are private merger claims, and almost all of them fail. That is why...

Ohio v. American Express: Clarence Thomas Sets Sail on a Sea of Doubt, and, Mirabile Dictu, It’s Still a Bad Idea

SCOTUS Forum. In the first of a roundtable of op-eds on the Supreme Court’s Amex decision of June 25, Chris Sagers harks back to...

No Fair Hearing for the DoJ in the AT&T-Time Warner Decision

Antitrust expert Chris Sagers of Cleveland State University enumerates the failings of Judge Richard Leon’s dismissal last week of the Department of Justice’s attempt...

Could the Steward Health v. BCBS Trial Revitalize Monopolization Law?

It’s nearly unheard of for a monopolization case to go to trial, but the Steward Health v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode...

The DOJ Has a Strong Case Against the AT&T-Time Warner Merger

If the merging parties are true to their many tough public statements, and they stick the litigation out long-term, the odds are not bad...

American Antitrust Is Having a Moment: Some Reactions to Commissioner Ohlhausen’s Recent Views

Contrary to what Federal Trade Commissioner Maureen Ohlhausen says, there is in fact no meaningful proof that consolidation generates social benefits. Editor's note: In...

Latest news