Webinar: Monopolies and the Rise of Nazism in Germany

Also Read

Who Is to Blame for the 2008 Financial Crisis?

The IGM Center at the University of Chicago has asked its American and European economist panel to rate the main causes of the financial...

Congress Is Leaning Towards a Big Tech Breakup

The dominant platforms have proven themselves to be ungovernable. Behavioral remedies, especially those that require continuous oversight, might be pushed aside. The...

Meet the Sugar Barons Who Used Both Sides of American Politics to Get Billions in Subsidies

Meet the Florida-based Fanjul brothers, who inject money to both political parties and dominate an industry that enjoys billions of dollar's worth of subsidies and protections.  Last week,...

Tech Monopolies Are the Reason the US Now Has a TikTok Problem

Tech platforms like Facebook say we should protect, empower, and celebrate their concentrated power for the sake of America’s national security. But...

The Stigler Center’s Monopolies and Politics Workshop Webinar Series explores some of the themes we’ll explore at our 2020 Antitrust and Competition Conference: University of Michigan professor Daniel Crane and BIICL’s Senior Research Fellow Liza Lovdahl Gormsen discuss whether industrial cartels played a role in facilitating the rise of Nazism in Germany. The conversation is moderated by Stigler Center Fellow Filippo Lancieri.

Watch a Stigler Center webinar with University of Michigan professor Daniel Crane and Liza Lovdahl Gormsen, a  Senior Research Fellow at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL), on whether industrial cartels played a role in facilitating the rise of Nazism in Germany, the subsequent attempts to reorganize the German industrial base, and whether the historical evidence can inform antitrust reform in the 21st century.

The conversation is moderated by Stigler Center Fellow Filippo Lancieri.

Daniel Crane is the Frederick Paul Furth Sr. Professor of Law. He served as the associate dean for faculty and research from 2013 to 2016. He teaches contracts, antitrust, antitrust and intellectual property, and legislation and regulation. He previously was a professor of law at Yeshiva University’s Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and a visiting professor at New York University School of Law and the University of Chicago Law School. Professor Crane’s work has appeared in the University of Chicago Law Review, the California Law Review, the Michigan Law Review, the Georgetown Law Journal, and the Cornell Law Review, among other journals. He is the author of several books on antitrust law, including Antitrust (Aspen, 2014), The Making of Competition Policy: Legal and Economic Sources (Oxford UP, 2013), and The Institutional Structure of Antitrust Enforcement (Oxford UP, 2011).

Liza Lovdahl Gormsen is a Senior Research Fellow in Competition Law and Director of the Competition Law Forum at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. Liza is a Non-Governmental Advisor to the International Competition Network (ICN), appointed by the UK Competition and Markets Authority. She is a member of the ICN Unilateral Conduct Working Group and the Agency Effectiveness Working Group. Liza sits on the advisory board of the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement (OUP) edited by Professor Bill Kovacic and Professor Ariel Ezrachi. She is a Board Member of the Open Markets Institute in Washington DC. Liza is the author of A Principled Approach to Abuse of Dominance (CUP, 2010) and European State Aid and Tax Rulings (Elgar, 2019).

Filippo Lancieri (moderator) is a research fellow at the Stigler Center and a JSD Candidate at the University of Chicago Law School. His research interests include antitrust, data protection and the political economy of regulation more broadly and his JSD thesis explores the challenges of regulating digital markets. Filippo’s work has appeared in the University of Chicago Law Review, the Antitrust Law Journal and the Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, among others. Filippo also coordinated the Stigler Center Committee on Digital Platforms.

ProMarket is dedicated to discussing how competition tends to be subverted by special interests. The posts represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty. For more information, please visit ProMarket Blog Policy.

Latest article

Should the European Union Require Tech Firms to Adopt a Common Charger?

According to a new European Commission directive expected to be approved in the next few months, tech firms will have to use...

Chart of the Week: Economists Don’t Think Congress Should Make Price Gouging Illegal

Most economists disagree with a new bill in the US that would set limits on "unconscionably excessive prices," according to a recent...

Neoliberal Economists Are Giving Biden Bad Advice on Inflation

To spare the economy from the pain of further interest rate hikes, the President should aggressively pursue anticompetitive conduct by companies in...

How Would the Big Tech Self-Preferencing Bill Affect Users? 

The Senate looks to be nearing a vote on the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, which would prohibit gatekeeping digital platforms...

New eBook Revisits George Stigler’s Theory of Regulatory Capture 50 Years Later

To mark the 50-year anniversary of George Stigler’s seminal piece, “The Theory of Economic Regulation” we are publishing a new eBook examining...