“Stop Looking for a Post-Covid Intellectual, We Have Found One”: Le Point Profiles Luigi Zingales

Also Read

Who Is to Blame for the 2008 Financial Crisis?

The IGM Center at the University of Chicago has asked its American and European economist panel to rate the main causes of the financial...

Meet the Sugar Barons Who Used Both Sides of American Politics to Get Billions in Subsidies

Meet the Florida-based Fanjul brothers, who inject money to both political parties and dominate an industry that enjoys billions of dollar's worth of subsidies and protections.  Last week,...

The Complicated Legacy of the “Chicago Boys” in Chile

How did a group of Chicago-trained economists manage to turn Chile into the cradle of neoliberalism? As the country aims to move...

The Real Dish on the T-Mobile/Sprint Merger: A Disastrous Deal From the Start

The Trump-era DOJ’s decision to allow the T-Mobile/Sprint merger will go down as one of the worst merger-enforcement mistakes in decades. This...

Writer and entrepreneur Mathieu Laine wrote an extensive profile of Luigi Zingales for the French magazine Le Point. They discussed the pandemic, the nature of capitalism, and how this crisis has impacted the relationship between states and their citizens.

“Stop looking for a post-Covid intellectual, we have found one. His name is Luigi Zingales and he is one of the most influential economists in the world. According to this Italian professor from the University of Chicago, the world after the pandemic should go back to the fundamentals of what capitalism really is and fix its unsustainable imbalances.”

This how Mathieu Laine—entrepreneur, academic, and writer—begins his long profile of Luigi Zingales in Le Point, one of the most respected magazines in France.

Zingales told Le Point that capitalism “has become cynical, losing ground, favoring rent, elitist cronyism, and collusion. This supposed capitalism plays against itself and against us all, as it is obsessed with the disappearance of rules and detached from the tragic consequences of the rise in inequalities, as well as the denial of long-term concerns: research, preservation of the planet, equal opportunities, ethics, and personal freedom.”

According to Laine’s profile, Zingales has “freedom pegged to the heart,” having been influenced by ideas “rather of the left” circulating in a family where, as a child, he was “marked by the stories” that his grandparents and parents “told about Fascist Italy.”

The 1974 referendum over the legalization of divorce in Italy was a pivotal moment in Zingales’s intellectual growth, Laine writes: 

“Luigi, barely eleven, attends the painful debate that tears apart Catholic Italy over the legalization of divorce. His father, ‘attached to the Church and personally refusing any separation, campaigned ardently for this right.’ ‘Only the freedom of the individual, he explains to his son, must guide such choices: neither God nor master can impose the conditions of happiness on anyone.’ Moved by this paternal feat, the future economist finds there a deep source of his commitment to the service of human freedom.”

Zingales graduated from Bocconi University, in Milan, then he went to MIT, in Boston, where he obtained his PhD in economics. The Italy he left in 1988, Zingales told Le Point, was “a system in which did not value what we knew, but who we knew.”

Since then, nothing has really changed in Italy, but other countries have followed in the same path, including the United States. Donald Trump is not so different from the Italian media mogul and former prime minister Silvio Berlusconi: both favored the evolution of their countries from capitalism to cronyism, which is “an open door to idleness, to the leveling down of an entire society. And if you are a woman, or worse, a migrant, it is a waste of time! Capitalism, the real thing, is not that. It gives everyone a chance, not just the supporters of the system who close the door behind them.”

Mathieu Laine

Zingales and Laine also discuss the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic implications. Zingales [one of the editors of this blog] wrote a series of articles for ProMarket on the importance of social distancing and mass testing. In a recent column, he [along with co-authors Efraim Benmelech and Paola Sapienza] argues that one of the most relevant obstacles that anti-contagion measures face in the United States is that a majority of Americans do not trust the federal government. Crises are defining moments for the relationship between a State and its citizens.

In Le Point, Zingales states that 

“Americans’ willingness to volunteer during the Second World War was directly correlated to the help their families received during the Great Depression. If JFK was able to ask Americans what they could do for their country, it was because they knew what their country had done for them.”

The way we all react to the current crisis will have effects, Zingales argues, “on the deep feeling of belonging, on the spirit of commitment that this will imply in the decades to come”. 

The conversation between Zingales and Laine ends with a comment on democracy and capitalism. According to Zingales, “Capitalism tends to pay more for merit and democracy tends to level the playing field.” Such a “productive tension” gives each one of us opportunities, but only “provided that the rules of the game are not distorted.” Laine agrees with this analysis and, in the last sentence of his article, writes that “If the world were to reinvent itself, it is that of Zingales that should be taken as a model”.

Latest article

Uninhibited Campaign Donations Risks Creating Oligarchy

In new research, Valentino Larcinese and Alberto Parmigiani find that the 1986 Reagan tax cuts led to greater campaign spending from wealthy individuals, who benefited the most from this policy. The authors argue that a very permissive system of political finance, combined with the erosion of tax progressivity, created the conditions for the mutual reinforcement of economic and political disparities. The result was an inequality spiral hardly compatible with democratic ideals.

Did the Meme Stock Revolution Actually Change Anything?

Many financial commentators thought that the surge of retail investors participating in the stock market, the most notable of whom boosted “meme stocks” like GameStop, would democratize corporate governance and improve prosocial firm behavior, including the promotion of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. In new research, Dhruv Aggarwal, Albert H. Choi, and Yoon-Ho Alex Lee find evidence that the exact opposite took place.

The Kroger-Albertsons Merger Will Not Help Grocery Competition

Kroger and Albertsons say they need to merge to compete with Walmart. Claire Kelloway argues that what they really want is Walmart’s monopsony power, and permitting mergers on these grounds will only harm suppliers, workers, and consumers.

Innovators Respond to Their Presidential Candidate Winning With More Innovation

Does an inventor’s political identity influence their productivity? In a new paper, Joseph Engelberg, Runjing Lu, William Mullins, and Richard Townsend examine the impacts of the 2008 and 2016 United States presidential elections on Democrat and Republican inventors, with a particular focus on the quantity and quality of patents after the country elects a new president.

Letter to the Editor: Former FTC and DOJ Chief Economists Urge Separation of Economic and Legal Analysis in Merger Guidelines

Seventeen former chief economists of the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division urge current Agency heads to separate the legal and economic analysis in the draft Merger Guidelines to strengthen the role of the latter in merger review.