Stigler Center Talk: Robert Bilott on How to Protect Our Drinking Water

Also Read

Who Is to Blame for the 2008 Financial Crisis?

The IGM Center at the University of Chicago has asked its American and European economist panel to rate the main causes of the financial...

Meet the Sugar Barons Who Used Both Sides of American Politics to Get Billions in Subsidies

Meet the Florida-based Fanjul brothers, who inject money to both political parties and dominate an industry that enjoys billions of dollar's worth of subsidies and protections.  Last week,...

Congress Is Leaning Towards a Big Tech Breakup

The dominant platforms have proven themselves to be ungovernable. Behavioral remedies, especially those that require continuous oversight, might be pushed aside. The...

The Real Dish on the T-Mobile/Sprint Merger: A Disastrous Deal From the Start

The Trump-era DOJ’s decision to allow the T-Mobile/Sprint merger will go down as one of the worst merger-enforcement mistakes in decades. This...

The lawyer who has been dubbed “DuPont’s Worst Nightmare” will discuss the legal, regulatory, political, and scientific challenges of addressing unregulated chemical contaminants in drinking water on March 31st.

Robert Bilott, who was recently dubbed “DuPont’s worst nightmare” by the New York Times, had been a corporate defense attorney for eight years when he took on an environmental lawsuit that exposed a decades-long chemical contamination of drinking water near a DuPont plant in West Virginia.

A partner at the Cincinnati law firm Taft Stettinius & Hollister, Bilott spent his first years as a lawyer defending large corporate clients, specializing in cases involving chemical companies. Yet when a local rancher from Parkersburg, West Virginia named Wilbur Tennant approached him, claiming that a DuPont landfill adjacent to his farm that was supposed to be non-hazardous had killed many of his cows, he decided to take the case.

However, what began as a simple lawsuit involving dead cattle developed into one of the most significant environmental class-action lawsuits in US history, as Bilott learned that DuPont had dumped thousands of tons of sludge laced with an unregulated chemical named PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid, or C8) that entered into the water supply of Parkersburg and neighboring towns. He also discovered that DuPont knew PFOA posed significant health risks, and set up the Parkersburg landfill, using 66-acres of land it previously purchased from Tennant’s family, for the purpose of removing the toxic sludge from its own property.

Bilott’s discoveries led to a class-action lawsuit against DuPont that he filed in 2001, on behalf of 70,000 residents of West Virginia and Ohio that had been drinking water containing high levels of PFOA for decades. Even after DuPont settled the class-action suit in 2004, agreeing to install filtration facilities in the six affected water districts and pay a cash settlement of $70 million, he decided to press forward. To date, 3,535 plaintiffs have filed personal-injury claims against DuPont. Bilott is currently getting ready to prosecute the third.

Next week, Bilott will give a talk at the Stigler Center about the legal, regulatory, political, and scientific challenges of addressing unregulated chemical contaminants in drinking water. The talk will take place on March 31st, at 5:00 PM.

Latest article

Stakeholder Motivations for “Private Sanctions” Against Russia

As the war in Ukraine enters its second year, a new study measures stakeholders’ desire to see their firms exit Russia and...

The Wicked Problem Embodied by The Twitter Files

In response to a recent ProMarket post about the Twitter Files, professor Tom Ginsburg points out that the toughest question lies in...

Study Shows Universal Bank Trades Are Informed by Private Commercial Borrower Information

New research by Rainer Haselmann, Christian Leuz, and Sebastian Schreiber finds evidence suggesting that German banks with commercial lending relationships improve their...

Industrial Policy Is a Seductive Mirage

Industrial policy was once so out of fashion that it was jokingly called “the policy that shall not be named.” Now it’s...

Antitrust Deregulation is Undermining Innovation

A 2000 amendment to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act made it easier for firms to merge without notifying US antitrust authorities. In new research,...