type here...

Clement Mulock

Clement Mulock is a student at Georgetown University Law Center (J.D. 2026). He has worked as a summer intern for the National Courts Section at the U.S. Department of Justice and as a summer associate for Kirkland & Ellis LLP in Washington, D.C. Prior to law school, he was a research assistant for the Board on Army Research and Development at the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. He received his Bachelor of Arts in International Studies from Virginia Tech.
Antitrust and Competition

Meta’s Winning Market Definition in Its Monopoly Case Relied on a Flawed Empirical Assumption

Clement Mulock
Meta prevailed in its monopoly case against the Federal Trade Commission by showing that the FTC’s market definition of personal social media was too narrow. However, Meta’s argument—and Judge James Boasberg’s ruling—rested on a flawed empirical assumption that confuses how users divert their time to other activities when no longer able to use a Meta platform with true product substitution.

Latest news

View All

The publication of the Stigler Center at The University of Chicago Booth School of Business

ProMarket is dedicated to discussing how competition tends to be subverted by special interests. The posts represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty. For more information, please visit ProMarket Policy.