Substantial fractions of the US labor force have children at home and will likely face obstacles in returning to work if childcare options remain closed. Under a policy where young workers return to work while schools remain closed, 35 million workers who are over 55 would not be able to return to work, and another 16 million who are under 55 would be constrained by childcare obligations.

Most states and cities in the US have shut all non-essential businesses in response to Covid-19. In this note, we argue that as policies are developed to “re-open” the economy and send people back to work, strategies for childcare arrangements, such as re-opening schools and daycares, will be important. Substantial fractions of the US labor force have children at home and will likely face obstacles to returning to work if childcare options remain closed. 

We explicitly refrain from any evaluation of public-health considerations related to school closures since we have no expertise in this area. We instead seek to focus solely on measuring economic constraints that arise in a phased employment recovery. It is entirely possible that these constraints may be unavoidable for public-health reasons.

Younger workers, who might be able to return to work earlier to the extent that they are less susceptible to the virus, are also more likely to require childcare arrangements in order to return to work.

Using 2018 data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS), we calculate the share of employed households who are affected by childcare constraints. Alon, Doepke, Olmstead-Rumsey, and Tertilt (2020) use ACS data to compute a number of closely related statistics, but they focus on measuring household childcare burdens while we use employed workers as our unit of analysis and focus specifically on measuring the importance of childcare constraints for aggregate, regional, and industry employment. We focus on the civilian employed population older than 18.

The first row in Table 1 shows that 32 percent of that workforce has someone in their household who is under 14. Thus, 50 million Americans must consider childcare obligations when returning to work. 

Daycares and pre-schools might open sooner than primary schools, since they tend to have fewer children and thus less scope for disease transmission, so the remaining columns of Table 1 distinguish children under 6 and those 6-14 years old. For about 30 percent of the workforce with childcare requirements, all of their children are under the age of 6. Thus, opening daycares alone could address childcare obstacles for one in three constrained workers.

Of course, many workers with children at home are not sole caregivers. Workers who live in a household with another non-working adult— such as a partner who is not employed, a retired parent or in-law, or an older child above 18 who lives at home—can likely return to work while another household member addresses their childcare needs.

The second row of Table 1 reports the share of all workers who live in a household with someone under 14 and no available caregiver. If non-working adults can assume household childcare responsibilities, 21 percent of the workforce would nonetheless have unaddressed childcare obligations.

Although 21 percent of the workforce will face some childcare burden when schools and daycares remain closed, some of them may resume work while other workers in their household address childcare needs. In particular, many workers with children live in households with other workers. Each household would potentially only need one adult to remain home with the children, freeing up the other adults to return to work. The third row of Table 1 shows that accounting for these childcare options leaves 11 percent of the workforce (or 17.5 million workers) facing major barriers to work if schools and daycares remain closed.

The White House and various other commentators have proposed a phased reopening of the economy in which initially only younger, less vulnerable workers return to work. Schools, daycares, and camps are proposed to open in later phases. Since older patients are more vulnerable to Covid-19, this would potentially balance the health risks for the most at-risk population while promoting economic activity.

However, the obstacles to returning to work imposed by school closings are somewhat higher for the under 55 population, because 40 percent of these workers have a child at home.

Table 1 shows that 14 percent (or roughly one in seven) of workers under 55 would likely face childcare-related obstacles to returning to work (even after accounting for the fact that in this scenario, workers over 55 in the household could then provide childcare).  

Under a policy where young workers return to work while schools remain closed, 35 million workers who are over 55 would not be able to return to work and another 16 million who are under 55 would be constrained by childcare obligations.

The obstacles that childcare imposes on workers during the Covid-19 crisis are similar across industries. Table 2 shows the key statistics for each broad industry category: the share of workers without within-household child care would only range from 18 percent in transportation to 25 percent in education and health care.

Figure 1 depicts spatial variation in the share of workers with childcare obligations and no available caregiver in their household. While this figure is as low as 13 percent and as high as 33 percent for some commuting zones, the vast majority of regions are near the national average of 21 percent. Thus, addressing childcare obligations as part of “re-opening” strategies is an important consideration for policymakers across the United States.

These results suggest that childcare-related constraints imposed by school closings should feature prominently in discussions of reopening the economy. While there is scope for a large rebound in employment even if schools and daycares remain closed, the economy will remain 17 million workers short of normal employment in this scenario. Furthermore, many of those working when schools are closed will only be able to do so if a spouse or partner or who would typically be working instead remains home.

The longer school closures persist into the recovery of the economy, the greater will be the burden faced by those workers with young children and no obvious childcare options. We again note that we are making no attempt to evaluate any public-health benefits of school closures or make any assessment of when schools should be reopened.

Public-health policies that mitigate the spread of the virus likely have high returns for the ultimate shape of any economic recovery. We instead simply note that discussions of returning to work ought to include discussion of returning to school.

Jonathan I. Dingel is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Christina Patterson is post-doc at Northwestern University, Department of Economics (she will join the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, as an assistant professor in July 2020). Joseph Vavra is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business  Also, read their working paper on the Becker-Friedman Institute website.

ProMarket is dedicated to discussing how competition tends to be subverted by special interests. The posts represent the opinions of their writers, not necessarily those of the University of Chicago, the Booth School of Business, or its faculty. For more information, please visit ProMarket Blog Policy.